A Look at The Four Spent the Day Together by Chris Kraus – A Cult Writer Ventures Into Something New

This latest work centers on individuals seeking fresh starts, struggling to escape substance abuse or abusive marriages, only to see hope turn into violence. Kraus often employs the phrase "clean slate", making it intentionally weary through its repetitions. Phrases such as "He could make a fresh start" and "They decided to make a fresh start" appear throughout the story. Meanwhile, she is embarking on her individual reinvention, since this seems a novel form of writing – fact-based, authentically narrative. But then it reveals itself to be filled with the recurring issues and approaches as earlier books.

From Unplanned Author to Cult Classic

Chris Kraus was originally an creative who became a writer almost accidentally with her 1997 seminal work I Love Dick, structured as missives to a distant beloved, converting personal female narrative from abjection into defiance. She continued writing, but the following three engaging and challenging novels missed the impact and rawness that the epistolary style imparted to the narrative voice of I Love Dick. It didn't help was her identity as a maverick maker who had evolved into a extensive real estate holder, so there was considerable focus on property transactions. It follows that she now wants to explore different types of content, turning outward to other people's stories, at a period in which she states that Trumpian politics makes confessional writing redundant.

Several Eras, Shared Inescapable History

The Four Spent the Day Together is structured in three parts, encompassing multiple eras – none able to break free from their backgrounds. We encounter the story of characters Emma and Jasper, representations of Kraus's parents, relocating from the New York borough to a pastoral setting. Then there is the narrative of the author, in the persona of protagonist Catt Greene, confronting the late recognition of I Love Dick, the ascent of a political figure, and her addict husband Paul. Finally the account of a killing of one lost young man by another in a locality long abandoned by liberal ideals only a brief drive from the protagonist's home in the Minnesota countryside.

From my perspective as a reader attracted to honed writing of the kind the author herself often avoids, I was enchanted by the literary tone of the initial segment.

As a reader who appreciates honed writing of the kind that Kraus herself tends to eschew, I was won over by the literary tone of the opening segment. It exhibits a fresh level of observation that accommodates minutiae, like the pail that the protagonist as a child dislodges from ice at the beginning of the narrative, aided by her adored dad. "I found an ice toy!" she declares; "a nice toy", he replies, "the ambiguous meanings of language tumbling in their mouths like hard candy". She tells the tale of Emma with inquiry and familiarity. "Emma felt like she'd stepped into a dream – not entirely her own."

Frustration and Disruption

I was bound to become frustrated when I hoped this different style could persist to the end. Kraus says here that she is annoyed by the enjoyment audiences such as myself have derived from I Love Dick; she's dedicated to fragmentation, to the untidy aesthetics she has in common with her hero author Kathy Acker, and the blankness and repetitiveness of her previous novels returns in the central part. Catt Greene is attempting to do up multiple decrepit residences in the most troubled areas of Albuquerque while traveling between Minnesota and LA, unsuccessful in assisting Paul curb his addiction. She experiences powerlessness as Paul moves between low-resource employment as an addiction therapist in a environment propelled by the anger and fear that underpins Trump's victory. Multiple pages are devoted about the protagonist facing cancellation on social media, her listed profession modified from "writer" to "landlord" on a reference site. Kraus still seems to invest excessive emotion about this. In a moment she says that she's researching the homicide so that before leaving Minnesota, "she might be able to learn something about an the nation that her online critics would fail to comprehend, would overlook entirely".

The Homicide Account

Then we reach to the actual killing – and the referenced day spent by the victim with the murderer and his companions. The author possesses great source material, and reconstructs step by step what occurred as Brandon came to meet Brittney after meeting her on an app where she marketed explicit images. He sought a sexual encounter but appears congenially to have passed the day alongside her friends, loitering having his vehicle repaired and paying for snacks and drugs, before being killed by gunfire by Brittney's partner Micah – a individual with mental health challenges who has repeatedly received inpatient care for fits of anger.

Fascination and Incompletion

The protagonist becomes fixated by the narrative, and I was fascinated by the way that Kraus's dual urges towards responsible documentation and daring boundary-pushing clash in this segment. Yet I wished her to explore more thoroughly her own obsessions here. The compelling persona is Brittney herself, who gains dimension in part due to the protagonist's connection to her – a similarly gifted, tormented individual spiraling out of control in a struggling, neglected community. The author informs us that Catt converses with Brittney in prison, but she doesn't dramatise these conversations. The complete segment feels oddly unfinished, to the extent that Kraus's narration ends almost mid-par

Sharon Thomas
Sharon Thomas

A digital artist and storyteller passionate about blending fantasy with reality in her works.